This article compares two popular facial cleansing devices: the Olay Pro-X and the Clarisonic Mia. Both promise a deep clean, but they achieve this through different mechanisms and offer distinct user experiences. We'll delve into a head-to-head comparison, examining their design, features, cleaning performance, and long-term costs. From the sleek, compact Olay Pro-X to the more substantial Clarisonic Mia, we'll explore the pros and cons of each device to help you decide which is the best fit for your skin and budget.This detailed review analyzes the differences in cleaning action (rotating vs. oscillating brush heads), ease of use, and the overall impact on skin. We'll assess the initial purchase price alongside the ongoing costs of replacement brush heads and batteries. Ultimately, our aim is to provide you with a comprehensive understanding of both devices, allowing you to make an informed decision based on your individual needs and preferences for achieving a truly clean and healthy complexion.
Pros And Cons
- Cleanses skin well
- Leaves skin feeling soft
- Oscillating brush head
- One setting (simpler to use)
- Two speeds
- Rotating brush head
- Water resistant (for shower use, but not submersion)
- Includes replacement brush head and exfoliating cleanser
- Can be used with a broad range of Olay cleansers
- Comes with a daily moisturizing lotion
- Removes makeup well
- Exfoliates
- Dried out reviewer's skin
- Brush heads may be difficult to find in local stores (reviewer had to order online)
- Battery operated (ongoing cost of batteries)
Read more: 5 Best Waterproof Facial Cleansing Brushes
Unboxing and First Impressions
The Olay Pro-X arrived in a sleek box, promising a six-times better clean and enhanced moisturizer absorption. It includes a renewal cleanser (though I used mine up quickly). The device itself is compact and surprisingly lightweight.
In contrast, my Clarisonic Mia, while a bit grimy from extended use, boasts a more substantial build. It's noticeably larger than the Pro-X, suggesting a different cleaning approach.
Features and Functionality
The Olay Pro-X features two speed settings and a rotating brush head. Its water-resistant design is convenient, although submerging it is discouraged. It's powered by two AA batteries (included).

The Clarisonic Mia, while simpler, has a single setting with an oscillating brush head. Its compact size makes it easy to handle, but its power source is also limited. The cleaning heads are replaceable for both, which is important to maintain hygiene.
Cleaning Experience and Results
Both devices effectively clean the skin; however, their cleaning mechanisms are vastly different. The Olay Pro-X's rotating head provides a more thorough, potentially more aggressive clean. The Clarisonic Mia's oscillating head, though gentler, provides more of a vibrating massage feel.

I found the Olay Pro-X, despite its effectiveness, tended to dry my skin out more than the Clarisonic. The Clarisonic Mia left my skin feeling incredibly soft, even with prolonged use. This difference might be due to the difference in brush head movement.
Additional Considerations
The Olay Pro-X is significantly more affordable upfront, but the ongoing cost of replacement brush heads and batteries needs to be factored into the long-term expense. Finding replacement heads for the Olay Pro-X may be more challenging than for the Clarisonic.
The Clarisonic Mia has a higher initial price point but may ultimately be more cost-effective in the long run, provided replacement brush heads are readily available and affordable in your area. It's crucial to weigh the initial versus long-term costs.
Conclusion: The Verdict
Ultimately, the choice between the Olay Pro-X and Clarisonic Mia depends on individual preferences and priorities. The Olay Pro-X is a budget-friendly option offering a deep clean, but its drying effect on my skin and the potential difficulty finding replacement heads are downsides.
The Clarisonic Mia, while more expensive upfront, delivered a consistently soft and clean feel without drying my skin. Its gentler oscillating motion and generally more readily available replacement heads make it a more appealing long-term option for me, despite the single speed setting.