Choosing between the ZIIP Halo and the ZIIP GX microcurrent devices can be tricky. Both devices offer effective, at-home microcurrent treatments designed to lift, de-puff, and improve skin tone over time. However, ZIIP has released an updated model, prompting a comparison of their features and benefits. This review delves into the key differences between the ZIIP Halo and its predecessor, the ZIIP GX, to help you decide which device best suits your needs and budget. We'll examine design improvements, app functionality, included gels, and the overall user experience to determine which microcurrent device reigns supreme.This comparison explores the aesthetic upgrades of the Halo, its simplified charging and intuitive interface, and the differences in app-based treatments. We'll also analyze the cost differences influenced by the included gels – the Halo's Electric Complex Gel versus the GX's pricier Golden Gel. Ultimately, we aim to provide a clear understanding of each device's strengths and weaknesses, allowing you to make an informed decision based on your individual preferences and priorities.
Pros And Cons
- Lighter than Zip GX
- More elegant design
- Flatter metal probes for easier current application
- More convenient button placement
- Uses USB-C connector
- Includes pre-loaded lift treatment (4-minute routine)
- More free-form treatments in the app
- Less intense, less tingling sensations
- Doesn't stop treatment when lifted off skin
- Lower price point compared to Zip GX due to less expensive gel
- Cannot access Zip GX treatments in the app
- Treatments can be synced to Zip Halo
- More formalized treatments in the app
- Heavier than Zip Halo
- Less elegant design
- Treatment stops when device is lifted
Read more: Top 5 Vibrating Facial Massagers for Glowing Skin
Design and Usability Improvements
The ZIIP Halo boasts a redesigned, sleeker appearance compared to its predecessor, the ZIIP GX. Its rounder shape and silver top layer offer a more elegant aesthetic. The metal probes are flatter, purportedly improving current conductivity and comfort during treatments.
The Halo's on/off button is conveniently located on the bottom, between the probes. This is a change from the GX's top-mounted button. Charging is simplified with the Halo's USB-C port, a welcome upgrade for many users.
While both devices operate similarly, the Halo's immediate light-up upon power-on, which brightens further upon correct probe placement, provides a more intuitive user experience. The Halo's treatment also doesn't interrupt if the probes are briefly lifted, which can make it faster.
Treatment Options and App Integration
Both devices are compatible with the ZIIP app, allowing users to customize their treatments. The Halo, however, comes pre-loaded with a quick four-minute "lift" treatment accessible without the app, enhancing convenience.
The Halo offers more free-form treatments within the app compared to the GX, which had more structured, step-by-step tutorials. Users can sync their preferred GX treatments to the Halo app, but not vice versa. This is due to the Halo’s additional waveform variations, that aren't replicated in the GX.
While the additional waveforms in the Halo might not be directly felt by the user, the brand suggests these differences lead to varied skin treatment effects. Ultimately, the choice between the structured GX treatments and the more adaptable Halo treatments is a matter of personal preference.
Gels and Pricing
The ZIIP Halo's lower price point compared to the GX is largely due to the included gel. The Halo comes with a bottle of Electric Complex Gel, while the GX included the more expensive Golden Gel.
The different gels offer varied formulations and ingredients. The Golden Gel is significantly more expensive, featuring peptides and growth factors, while the Electric Complex Gel provides a more budget-friendly option.
This cost difference makes the Halo more accessible, although both gels can be purchased separately. Users can choose the gel best suited to their budget and skincare preferences.
Overall Performance and Conclusion
In terms of immediate results, both the ZIIP Halo and ZIIP GX provide similar lifting and de-puffing effects, although these are temporary. The long-term benefits, concerning collagen production, are difficult to quantify and observe within a short timeframe.
The reviewer found the Halo less intense, with less tingling sensation, which may be due to its varied waveforms. However, this doesn't necessarily indicate reduced effectiveness.
Ultimately, the ZIIP Halo is the preferred device for its improved design, ease of use, pre-loaded treatments, and more affordable entry point. While the ZIIP GX still offers excellent functionality, the Halo presents notable enhancements for the price.